BS Detector on Ten Reasons Why Gold Isn’t Above $1,000 — Seeking Alpha

06/03/2009 § Leave a comment

Just in case Seeking Alpha shows up here, plumstupid is quite clearly the same person as bosun.j, and is still systematically giving thumbs down to all of my comments. It looks like he has learned something, however, as at first glance it appears he’s not giving his own comments positive votes.
Jeffry, why don’t you stop being a naay thuaa dam and get on with your life?
By the way, pretty funny that your latest comment above already had a -1 when I saw it. Did you do that, or did somebody follow your link and do it? Have you been ticking people off like before?
> Who are you to be so exercised about this? Why are you offended?
The problem, my little ex-pat khohn ngoh, is that people who are not well-regarded should not be allowed to masquerade as such, especially while doling out investment opinions and advice. This is not like voting for the homecoming queen; if the rating function is co-opted, it could actually be doing harm. Get it?
Get it, Seeking Alpha?

Quite obviously this individual has a serious problem. As we are not medical professionals we wouldn’t want to speculate whether this guy’s condition reaches the level of pathology.

Sad. So sad!

BS Detector on Ten Reasons Why Gold Isn’t Above $1,000 — Seeking Alpha

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading BS Detector on Ten Reasons Why Gold Isn’t Above $1,000 — Seeking Alpha at GET OUT WHILE YOU STILL CAN!!.

meta

%d bloggers like this: